Dutton will only set us back

First it was Josh Frydenberg’s “Back in Black” now it’s Peter Dutton’s “Back on Track.” Frydenberg came nowhere near to delivering that promised surplus but voters believed his boast and the Coalition won the election of 2019.

Now Peter Dutton is promising to get us ‘back on track’, except, this time unfortunately he’ll do just that. We’ll have inflation back to 6 per cent, eye-watering debt, 5 per cent unemployment, tax cuts for top income earners, no credible climate change policy, remembering they had 22 plans but were did not implement any of them because they were terrified of the likes of Dutton and Barnaby Joyce. There will be no compassion for the poor (remember Robodebt) and no tax cuts for low-income earners.

Now Dutton beats the Donald Trump drum. The wealthy will wallow in the spoils, the less fortunate will be left behind.

There is also much talk of Peter Dutton’s secret weapon of focussing on crime. The thrust of this line of attack is to evoke doubt and fear. It is, in essence, also a criticism of our judiciary. Former Liberal attorney-general, George Brandis, once stated that Dutton always found the judiciary “an inconvenience”. This tactic of amplifying crime worked in the Northern territory and in Queensland which is federally Dutton’s strongest state. It worked for Donald Trump who said thousands of murderers had crossed US’s open borders and that illegal Haitian immigrants were eating the cats and dogs of the citizens of Springfield, Ohio.

But it backfired for Dutton in Victoria when he demonised African Australians as making it difficult for others to go about their normal lives. Labor premier Dan Andrews increased his majority in the subsequent election.

The real issue is cost-of-living. Many are doing it tough but there have been more than a million jobs created which helps more people to pay their bills. Average unemployment is at 3.9% which is far better than the 5.6% under Tony Abbott and 6.3% under John Howard.

While opposing every cost-of-living measure introduced by the Labor government, the Coalition beats the well-worn drum of excessive spending. But its own record of blatant pork-barrelling via sports rorts and car parks and handing millions of dollars to companies that were already making huge profits, is hardly glowing.

Dutton may think crime is his trump card (pun intended) but when it comes to the broader Australian community, he’ll need to propose viable alternatives to all the policies he has opposed, especially those on housing, cheaper medicines, child care and tax cuts for all Australians.

Who are Dutton’s ‘elites’?

There will be an overuse of the word “elites” by the Coalition when the federal election campaign kicks off. Already their media backers have warned Labor from cosying up to the “elites” at the expense of caring for the ordinary forgotten folk.

How does one define elite? Would it include multi-billionaires like Gina Rinehart, Donald Trump and Elon Musk? They were all at Mar-a-Lago when Trump celebrated his election victory. Former deputy leader of the Liberal Party vice-president Teena McQueen, special adviser to Rinehart, was sitting right next to her exclaiming, “It was the best night of my life!”. I would say all of the above.

Earlier this year Peter Dutton flew to WA just for an hour to pay homage to Gina Rinehart’s at her 70th birthday celebration. This was just before the Dunkley by-election. Radio announcer Ben Fordham, no friend of Labor, said it was a “bad call”. Needless to say, Dutton received accolades from Rinehart for being an “outstanding leader”.

Who are the ordinary folk? They are generally the every-day folk who don’t earn 6-digit salaries. They are the folk who mostly did not get a single cent of tax cuts from the government which included Peter Dutton as a prominent minister. They are the folk who were all given a tax cut when Labor’s Jim Chalmers had settled in as Treasurer of Australia.